RehabMeasures Instrument
  1. Rehabilitation Measures Database
  2. Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Index

Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Index

Last Updated

Purpose

The BDI-TDI measures changes in dyspnea severity from the baseline as established by the Baseline Dyspnea Index in 3 categories: functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort.

Link to Instrument

Acronym BDI-TDI

Administration Mode

Paper & Pencil

Cost

Not Free

Cost Description

Permission needed. User required to complete and sign a User Agreement. A fee may be incurred depending on context of use and study design.

Diagnosis/Conditions

  • Pulmonary Disorders

Populations

Pulmonary Diseases

Key Descriptions

  • Baseline Dyspnea Index:
    1) Used to find baseline dyspnea in 3 categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort).
    2) Interviewer-administered rating.
    3) Scores range from 0 (severe) to 4 (unimpaired) for each domain.
    4) The sum of all domains yields the BDI focal score (0-12)
  • Transitional Dyspnea Index:
    1) Used to find change in dyspnea in 3 categories (functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort).
    2) Interviewer-administered rating.
    3) Scores range from ?3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement) for each domain.
    4) The sum of all domains yields the TDI focal score (?9 to +9).
    5) A negative score indicates more severity in dyspnea whereas a positive score shows positive gains.
    6) In case of circumstances in which impairment is due to reasons other than dyspnea, that specific category does get scored and is not a contributor to the overall score

Number of Items

24

Equipment Required

  • Survey instrument and writing instrument.

Time to Administer

5-10 minutes

Depends on the interviewing process.

Required Training

Reading an Article/Manual

Instrument Reviewers

Initially reviewed by Micaela Hornstein, SPT in 12/2013.

ICF Domain

Activity

Considerations

  • Good for measurement of specific components of dyspnea combined to provide a more detailed description than other tests.

  • Easy to use and relatively little time to conduct (Mahler, 1984).

  • Minimal evidence of reliability limits this tool.

  • Raters need to be experienced and have expertise in the area of dyspnea, along with familiarity of the ratings. This allows appropriate interview questioning.

  • Lacks standardized questions for raters (Eakin, 1995).

  • Interviewer bias: potential bias by the interviewer and/or patient.

  • Recall bias: Need BDI on hand.(Eakin, 1995; Glaab, 2010).

Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us! 

Pulmonary Diseases

back to Populations

Minimal Detectable Change (MDC)

COPD: 

(Mahler and Witek et al., 2003a; n = 921; mean age = 65(8) years, retrospective analysis of data from a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial; all subjects dx with COPD (~ 8yrs))

  • MDC = 1 point

 

(Mahler and Witek et al., 2003b; n = 997; mean age = 64 years; multinational trial)

  • MDC = 1 point

Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

COPD:

(Mahler and Witek et al., 2003a)

  • MCID = 1 point 

 

(Mahler and Witek et al., 2003b)

  • MCID = 1 point

Interrater/Intrarater Reliability

COPD:

(Eakin, Sassi-Dambron, Ries et al., 1995; n = 143; mean age = 67.7 (8.6) years; 6 measures of dyspnea were reviewed)

  • Excellent interrater reliability (ICC = 0.83)

Construct Validity

COPD:

(Mahler et al., 1984)

  • Adequate construct validity with the 12 Minute Walk Test (r = 0.33)

Bibliography

Eakin, E. G., Sassi-Dambron, D. E., et al. (1995). "Reliability and validity of dyspnea measures in patients with obstructive lung disease." Int J Behav Med 2(2): 118-134.

Glaab, T., Vogelmeier, C., et al. (2010). "Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations." Respir Res 11(1): 79.

Mahler, D. A., Weinberg, D. H., et al. (1984). "The measurement of dyspnea. Contents, interobserver agreement, and physiologic correlates of two new clinical indexes." Chest 85(6): 751-758.

Witek Jr, T. J. and Mahler, D. A. (2003). "Meaningful effect size and patterns of response of the transition dyspnea index." Journal of clinical epidemiology 56(3): 248-255.

Witek, T. J., Jr. and Mahler, D. A. (2003). "Minimal important difference of the transition dyspnoea index in a multinational clinical trial." Eur Respir J 21(2): 267-272.

rehabilitation measures

More Instruments Like This

We have reviewed more than 500 instruments for use with a number of diagnoses including stroke, spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury among several others.

updated Nov 5, 2024

Leicester Cough Questionna...

read more

updated Jan 9, 2024

Performance Assessment of ...

read more

updated Nov 21, 2023

Work Productivity & Activi...

read more