ÄÛBÑо¿Ôº

Children who were acutely burned or experienced a traffic crash: (Saxe et al., 2003; n = 84 (43 w/acute burn, mean age = 11.67 (3.20) years, male = 65%; 41 w/experience of a traffic crash, mean age = 10.0 (3.55) years, male = 70%); Long form (36-item) CSDC)

• SEM (calculated) for children with acute burns (n = 43): 4.11
• SEM (calculated) for children experiencing a traffic crash (n = 41): 3.05

Children who were acutely burned or experienced a traffic crash: (Saxe et al., 2003; Long form (36-item) CSDC)

• MDC (calculated) for children with acute burns (n = 43) at 95% CI = 11.39
• MDC (calculated) for children experiencing a traffic crash (n = 41) at 95% CI = 8.45

Children with Injury or Burns: (Bosquet Enlow et al., 2010; n = 147, mean age = 13.11 (3.52) years, age range = 6 to 18, male = 73.5% (32 admitted for an acute burn, mean age = 11.44 (3.55), age range = 6 to 17, male = 75%; 115 admitted for an acute injury, mean age = 13.57 (3.39), age range = 7 to 18, male = 73%); Long form (30 symptom items only) and Short form (4-item) CSDC)

• Acceptable test-retest reliability for both 30-item (ICC = 0.86, p < .001) and 4-item (ICC = 0.89, p < .001) CSDC scales

Children with Burns: (Saxe et al., 2003, 1^st administration (n = 34), 2^nd administration two days later (n = 23); reported by parents of children with burns; Long form (36-item) CSDC)

• Acceptable test-retest reliability for Total score (ICC = 0.84)
• Test-retest reliability for Subscales:
  • Arousal: Acceptable (ICC = 0.74)
  • Numbing and disassociation: Acceptable (ICC = 0.70)
  • Avoidance: Acceptable (ICC = 0.85)
  • Functioning: Not Acceptable (ICC = 0.63)
  • Re-experiencing: Acceptable (ICC = 0.89)

Children with Injury or Burns: (Bosquet Enlow et al., 2010; Long form (30 symptom items only) and Short form (4-item) CSDC)

• Poor interrater reliability between scores from parents and nurses for 30-item scale (ICC = 0.27, p < .05)
• Adequate interrater reliability between scores from parents and nurses for 4-item scale (ICC = 0.43, p < .001)

Children with Burns: (Saxe et al., 2003; Long form (36-item) CSDC)

• Adequate interrater reliability for total scores by the parent and primary nurse (ICC = 0.44)
• Poor interrater reliability for arousal scores by the parent and primary nurse (ICC = 0.36)
• Poor interrater reliability for numbing and dissociation scores by the parent and primary nurse (ICC = 0.24)
• Poor interrater reliability for avoidance scores by the parent and primary nurse (ICC = 0.28).
• Poor interrater reliability for Functioning by the parent and primary nurse (ICC = 0.27)
• Adequate interrater reliability for Reexperiencing by the parent and primary nurse (ICC = 0.45)

Children with Injury or Burns: (Bosquet Enlow et al., 2010; Long form (30 symptom items only) and Short form (4-item) CSDC)

• Excellent internal consistency for both 30-item (Cronbach¡¯s alpha = 0.93) and 4-item (Cronbach¡¯s alpha = 0.82) CSDC scales

Children with Burns: (Saxe et al., 2003; Long form (36-item) CSDC)

• Excellent internal consistency for children who experienced both traffic crashes and acute burns (Cronbach¡¯s alpha = 0.84, n  = 84).
• Excellent internal consistency for children with burns (Cronbach¡¯s alpha = 0.83, n = 43)
• Excellent internal consistency for children in a traffic crash (Cronbach¡¯s alpha = 0.86, n = 86)

Convergent validity:

Children with Burns: (Stoddard et al., 2009; n = 70; mean age = 1.97 (0.98), age range = 1-4 years, male = 41 (59%); participants completing baseline and 3 to 6-month follow-ups; 36-item CSDC-Burn Version (CSDC-B))

• Adequate to excellent convergent validity of the baseline CDSC total score with the total score for the PTSD module of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA-P) given at three time points (r = 0.44, p < 0.001 at baseline; r = 0.57, p < 0.001 at 1-month post-hospitalization; and r = 0.68, p < 0.01 at 3 to 6-months post-hospitalization)
• Poor, adequate, and excellent convergent validity of the CDSC total score with score from the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Semi-Structured Interview and Observational Record for Infants and Young Children (PTSDSSI) given at 3 time points (r = 0.28, p < 0.05 at baseline; r = 0.41, p < 0.05 at 1-month post-hospitalization; and r = 0.63, p < 0.05 at 3 to 6-months post-hospitalization)

Discriminant validity:

Children with Injury or Burns: (Bosquet Enlow et al., 2010; Long form (30 symptom items only) and Short form (4-item) CSDC)

• Excellent discriminant validity between the 30-item CSDC (r = 0.28, p < 0.01) and 4-item CSDC (r = 0.15) with the CBCL-Delinquency Scale

Children with Injury or Burns: (Bosquet Enlow et al., 2010; Long form (30 symptom items only) and Short form (4-item) CSDC)

• Using parents' response data to the 30-item CSDC, 6 items were identified that performed well on the item selection criteria. After pilot testing an earlier version of the scale, two of the items (¡°child avoids talking about the injury¡± and ¡°child tries to avoid thinking about the injury¡±) were eliminated due to concerns reported from scale administrators about the difficulty observers had in assessing these symptoms (p. 324).