Purpose
Measures perceived ability to accomplish common functional tasks independently versus need for assistance or supervision to do the tasks safely.
Acronym
FSAS
Area of Assessment
Cognition
Assessment Type
Patient Reported Outcomes
Administration Mode
Paper & Pencil
Cost
Free
- Patient rates self on a 4-step rating scale:
A) can do alone
B) needs someone present to supervise and provide occasional reminders to ensure safety and success
C) needs someone present for hands on assistance and/or frequent cues to ensure safety and success
D) totally dependent or unable to assist therapist at all
- The therapist also rates the patient’s ability to perform these tasks using the same rating scale.
- A numerical score is assigned to each response (e.g., A = 1, B = 2), and scores are summed resulting in a range of scores from 12-48.
- Differences in patient and therapist scores are compared to indicate how well the patient self-rates abilities.
- The measure is designed for use in an institutional setting.
Required Training
Reading an Article/Manual
Instrument Reviewers
Initially reviewed by Karen McCulloch, PT, PhD, NCS and the TBI EDGE task force of the Neurology Section of the APTA in 5/2012; Reviewed by Karen M., 11/27/16.
ICF Domain
Activity
Measurement Domain
Cognition
Professional Association Recommendation
Recommendations for use of the instrument from the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association’s Multiple Sclerosis Taskforce (MSEDGE), Parkinson’s Taskforce (PD EDGE), Spinal Cord Injury Taskforce (PD EDGE), Stroke Taskforce (StrokEDGE), Traumatic Brain Injury Taskforce (TBI EDGE), and Vestibular Taskforce (Vestibular EDGE) are listed below. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.
For detailed information about how recommendations were made, please visit:
Abbreviations:
|
|
HR
|
Highly Recommend
|
R
|
Recommend
|
LS / UR
|
Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group / Unable to Recommend
|
NR
|
Not Recommended
|
Recommendations based on level of care in which the assessment is taken:
|
Acute Care
|
Inpatient Rehabilitation
|
Skilled Nursing Facility
|
Outpatient
Rehabilitation
|
Home Health
|
TBI EDGE
|
NR
|
LS
|
NR
|
NR
|
NR
|
Recommendations for use based on ambulatory status after brain injury:
|
Completely Independent
|
Mildly dependant
|
Moderately Dependant
|
Severely Dependant
|
TBI EDGE
|
LS
|
LS
|
LS
|
NR
|
Recommendations for entry-level physical therapy education and use in research:
|
Students should learn to administer this tool? (Y/N)
|
Students should be exposed to tool? (Y/N)
|
Appropriate for use in intervention research studies? (Y/N)
|
Is additional research warranted for this tool (Y/N)
|
TBI EDGE
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Not reported
|
Considerations
-
Designed for use in inpatient settings
-
Examines possible self-awareness deficits that other assessments may not detect
-
Lack of study of reliability and minimal validation is a significant weakness