ÄÛBÑо¿Ôº

Instrument Reviewers

Initially reviewed by Sophia Anagnos, BS, Annie Elder, BA, Eva Hoffrichter, BSN, RN

Considerations

• It is recommended that therapists score behaviors as close to the observation time as possible.
• The assessment can be administered in a variety of settings.
• Appropriateness of assessment should be based off of developmental age rather than chronological age.

Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us!

Bibliography

Andersen, S., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. (2005). An Examination of the measurement properties of the pediatric volitional questionnaire. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25(1/2): 39-57.

Basu, S., Kafkes, A., Schatz, R., Kiraly, A., & Kielhofner, G. (2008). A user¡¯s manual for the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire (2.1 ed.). Chicago, IL: Model of Human Occupation Clearinghouse, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois of Chicago.

Geist, R. (1998). The validity study of the pediatric volitional questionnaire. Unpublished master¡¯s thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Miller, L., Ziviani, J., & Boyd, R. N. (2014). A systematic review of clinimetric properties of measurements of motivation for children aged 5-16 years with a physical disability or motor delay. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics,34(1), 90-111.

Reid, D. T., (2005). Correlation of the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire with the Test of Playfulness in a virtual environment: the power of engagement. Early child development and care, 175(2), 153-164.

Taylor, R. R., Kielhofner, G., Smith, C., Butler, S., Cahill, S. M., Ciukaj, M. D., & Gehman, M. (2009). Volitional change in children with autism: A single-case design study of the impact of hippotherapy on motivation. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 25(2), 192-200.